Points for game stuff?

by Atriax on Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:28 pm

I suggest 30'000 for an in-game NPC,
50'000 for an in-game shopkeeper,

10'000 for each item in the game named after you.
Eg. Atriax' longsword etc.

Then, there could be a ridiculous amount for quest-chains etc.
100'000 or so.

by Caeel on Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:37 pm

Hmm, well if you think about... No one has that many points but me... And I only have enough for and NPC... Most certainly not a quest chain. I think quest chains should be parts of NPCs. You could have an NPC for say 25,000 points, and then to add a quest chain to it for 5,000 points a quest, and maybe add a shop for 15,000.

I like where you going, but it's a little far fetched right now.

by V on Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:45 pm

You learned how to code shops?

Anyway, I think its a good idea. It would give alot more value to points, and a few people do have that many points to spend.

Caeel, they are expensive- But I wouldn't want 150+ requests for named items, NPCs, Quests, Zones, and so on.

by Seth2014 on Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:17 pm

Are you telling me we can make our own shops? O.o

by Gast on Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:57 am

Hmn sounds good to me. With this suggestion, the active people (with more points) are getting some kind of reward for their activity ;).

by **Shadow** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:17 am

I think that's a really good idea!
/support

by **Erik** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:04 am

Personally, I don't like the idea. The problem is, right now points are mainly only coming from shops, donating, and posts. If posting was worth much more, then I would agree with the idea. This is pretty much saying that if you attend TR clans and win, or have a special skill like being an artist, then you get special TR game privileges. :/ Maybe if we get jobs going, it will be more practical.

by **Charon** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:34 am

This gives people more motivation to donate and to come to cons. I support it. ^^

by **Erik** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:23 am

Not everyone can make the times, this will be much more practical if there are multiple times for cons.

by **Shadow** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:25 am

This is not the place to discuss multiple cons, that is done in the thread for that.

But yeah, I agree with you, we do need multiple cons.

by **Erik** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:26 am

I was just saying it would make this idea more practical.

by **Shadow** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:30 am

Not really, this is about spending the points and that is about getting the points.

by Weena on Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:34 am

Excellent idea! Maybe a bit unfair for new people, though it gives old members their loyalty on a platter, figuratively speaking of course (Did I make any sense?)

by Caeel on Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:19 am

Ahem, if you haven't noticed my last post, the only people who can afford half of this stuff are me, and any admin who chose to edit his points value (as right now they are all negative).

by **Shadow** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:22 am

Well then, people can decide to buy a game thing instead of a rank, or they might be able to get more if multiple cons are introduced... and also, those prices aren't set in stone yet.

Points for game stuff?

Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?

Re: Points for game stuff?