Re: Female Armors

by **Charon** on Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:19 pm

Of course.

by Evangel on Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:30 pm

I think its safe to say that pretty much half of the people agree and the other half disagree.

by **Xusha** on Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:31 pm

Evangel wrote:I think its safe to say that pretty much half of the people agree and the other half disagree.

I'd say that most don't care, to be honest. That's why we only have so many posting here. This is just how I think it is though.

by wwwtoy on Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:33 pm

Meh in my opinion its fine compared this to Wizard 101. Besides a letter wont work. You wont have enough supporters. <_<

by Evangel on Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:59 pm

As soon as Artix sees that there is people passionate about it, he'd do something. Something. That doesn't exactly mean taking skin out of the picture entirely. Only making it more appropriate.

Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.

by **Xusha** on Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:02 pm

Evangel wrote:As soon as Artix sees that there is people passionate about it, he'd do something. Something. That doesn't exactly mean taking skin out of the picture entirely. Only making it more appropriate.

Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.

That's because you don't have to wear them. Being a female, and seeing the original design for the Shadowslayer, I saw something I thought would be epic. The small change you forced upon it made it into something that is completely abnormal. You should be satisfied with that endeavor, and call it a day.

by wwwtoy on Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:06 pm

Shadowslayer X was better... Than people started complaining and we got this. D:<

by **Rage** on Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:15 pm

To be honest, I'm fine with how the art is handled as of now. My only beef is that gender is irreversible choice.

Actually, now that I think about it, if genders weren't preset as they are, we wouldn't have the harassment problems that I spoke of earlier. Make it like AQ, ya know?

by SS on Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:23 pm

Evangel wrote:Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.

Well actually Vampire Emissary looks like a cheap version of Shadow Weaver.

by Zeo on Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:14 pm

/facepalm

For the love of.....

WHY IS THERE EVEN A DEBATE ON THIS?!?!?!

It's NOT 'E for Everyone', its 'E-10 and up'.

Now seriously, think about what we are debating on here. We are debating on armours that show skin. Animated. Kay, so, if i were 10 and went to the local beach, somethign would have to be done about it? Just because its animated artwork doesn't mean a bikini is unacceptable. Oh, next thing you know its illegal to have babies brest fed because of NUDITY. Everyone here saying AQW is *insert soemthing here* with female armours, your over-reacting.

10 year olds ARE NOT going to notice, or think anything of, a bikini armour, or a armour showing the thigh, or a leotard, or a low-neck dress, etc, etc. They are going to play AQW and have fun playing it, you know, like what the main focus on a game should be?

Give me ONE THING in AQW that is inappropriate for AQW, and tell me why 10 year olds would notice it, and think something of it. Thats right. YOU CAN'T.

AQW is a Online Game, not only that, a ANIME-based MMORPG. There is nothing in AQW that is worse than some of the things 13 and under's can watch on television.

This whole thing is just pointless.

Just stop. It's a waste of time arguing about this.

BTW,

Evangel wrote:That's a whole different story. At a swimming pool, you have to wear revealing clothes, its not like you're gonna swim fully dressed. I'm talking about UNNECESSARY PARTIAL NUDITY. Like, almost every single female armor having exposed thighs.

Would a person in real life wear something like that? A full suit or armor with the exception of the thigh?

This game is anime-based. Ever seen a Anime-cosplay-con?

by Guest on Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:42 pm

Man, the more I see this discussion, the more I want to slap someone.
SOME PEOPLE LIKE TO WEAR REVEALING CLOTHES
SOME DO NOT
AQW HAS ARMOURS FOR BOTH
QUIT COMPLAINING AND WEAR WHAT SUITS YOU!

by **Icey** on Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:39 pm

Exactly what I think Sebi. Im glad someone said it. :D

by **Erik** on Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:27 am

I don't understand anymore why this fighting is going on. Sebi said it nearly the way I would, except in caps. I didn't even pay attention to the female armors before, until this was brought up. There is no nudity, therefore I see no problem. One person on twitter just mentioned it, because they over-exaggerate everything and probably have issues, and then everyone else exploded over it.

by Nagi on Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:44 am

I request a Lock.

by Guest on Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:54 am

I second that lock request...
And I also add a zipper-on-everyone-who-keeps-complaining-about-this-all-the-time-mouth request, dont mean to sound like a jerk but this has turned from a a reasonable argument to an all out flame war!

Also, Id like to add one more thing to everyone who thinks that these armour are revealing, at least 50% of players happen to like it that way, consider that the next time you complain!