Re: Female Armors

by Peregrine on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:01 am

All in favor of sending a letter to AE?

And what is it that you intend to say in such a letter?

They're not going to take action. Not only do we not have any evidence that it was him whatsoever, but I seriously doubt they'll reprimand him for his actions on adult websites like the one in question.

by Guest on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:03 am

Still, a flash animated porno? What kind of interests does this guy have!? Does AE really need a perverted artist to design everything?

by Crystal Lion on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:06 am

And worse off, in the porno, he made a female double of Disney's Mowgli of the Jungle Book, and short-horned versions of Twileks.

by Evangel on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:24 am

O.K. this isn't an artist flame-fest. Back to the real problem. Miltonius isn't at fault, he gets told what to draw and how to draw it, sometimes.

by **Icey** on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:26 am

Thank you Evan, Please dont let this thread get out of hand or I will have to lock it. Keep it mostly PG rated.

by Crystal Lion on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:27 am

But who else is asking him to draw burlesque?

by Evangel on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:29 am

Cysero heads AQW, so I would assume him. I mean, he IS the one who made the post about how AQW "needed" burlesque armors to draw in players.

by Crystal Lion on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:42 am

Didn't he also say he'd try to make AQW a bit less burlesque, too?

by Peregrine on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:44 am

I don't agree with Cysero, but I do see where he drew that conclusion from.

As of right now, the game has no stats (outside PTR), no raids, etc. It's lacking quite a number of the things that make an MMO an MMO.

All the weapons do approximately the same damage and each class has about four skills. That means you have four buttons to click while killing things. It gets boring after a while.

The main story can be summed up in about a paragraph.

It's ~$50-60 dollars a year to get full benefits, which amounts to better looking items that do more damage, but all still in approximately the same amounts.

In short, AQW isn't developed enough yet to attract players.

But like I said, revealing female outfits isn't the way to go about fixing this.

by Crystal Lion on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:54 am

Pere's right. Relying only on burlesque to attract players is going end up turning off players who are fed up with the compulsory revealing clothes cliche, and reinforce the stereotype that games must have burlesque to even remotely be called a game.

by Peregrine on Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:58 am

I don't even understand how that became a stereotype in the first place.

I mean, come on people.

by **Shadow** on Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:05 am

Charon wrote:Let's just all be glad we haven't seen anything worse.

Unfortunately, I have seen worse... Akumi. *shudder*

by Crystal Lion on Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:11 am

Brrr, so, did you think the molested security guard looked like Mowgli's female double?

by **Shadow** on Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:14 am

I didn't see it at first, but now that I think if it, she does look a lot like Mowgli.

by Crystal Lion on Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:25 am

Well, Milt's fond of genderbending Disney characters or making doubles out of them. Noticed that Gravelyn's practically a cutesy version of Jessica Rabbit?