Re: What do YOU think about milt items going rare for GOOD?

by **Erik** on Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:48 am

Please stay on topic so I don't have to keep deleting your posts Jason and Payton.

by **Cial** on Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:40 am

wwwtoy wrote:I really wonder,did milt ever get a say about this? If he did Im sure he would tweet it or post it on the AEF. Cysero basicly killed Ters. Cysero basicly took control of Ters..(and annoyed alot of people off in the process) I have to be honest with you,I would <---(read that word again) have been a flamer if so much if my fwiends (User,Vampiric,Trog etc) werent AKs. If Milt got a say in this and posted it I would love to see where he posted it,otherwise Ill keep thinking cysero made this decision himself without telling anyone.

Use "Annoyed" instead of that other word you used >.>
~Flawsie (Killmaster)

Seriously, STOP BLAMING CYSERO.

He really didn't do anything wrong, at all!

Nythera and Zazul have been getting the after-affects of Milt's zone for a while now. While he's been coding in his items, Ny and Zaz are wading through lost accounts complaining they lost it because of Miltonious' zone.

Cysero just wanted to help them out. I don't know about you, but I would have done the same. He didn't "Take over" anything. He fixed a problem.

By the way, I'm sure he got a say. It's not fair to blame Cy for something he didn't do, and you don't know if he DID do it or not.

by Jason on Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:26 am

People have just started hating on Cys, I have no clue why o.e

by **Icey** on Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:29 am

Hmm imo if it wasnt for Cys there pretty much wouldnt be an AQW and seriously people Milt stuff is cool and all but the obsession is a little....annoying...and just takes the fun out of things imo...

by Jason on Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:31 am

Agreed, icey

by Indestructable on Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:09 pm

My personal fact on them going "Perma rare" is that instead of ruining EVERYONE'S fun of the old items, they should've just updated the art of the AC "(rare)" items. Doesn't make a big difference if they were avliable for free for a few days. Still was avaliable, and thus losing the Value of ACs. They should've just made the "(rare)" orbs Owner only and such. And, really guys, if Milt had even the SLIGHTEST say in this he would've posted instead of Cysero putting words in his mouth ._. It is after all tercessuinotlim, not tercesoresyc.

by **Erik** on Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:48 am

Cial wrote:
Nythera and Zazul have been getting the after-affects of Milt's zone for a while now. While he's been coding in his items, Ny and Zaz are wading through lost accounts complaining they lost it because of Miltonious' zone.

Cysero just wanted to help them out. I don't know about you, but I would have done the same. He didn't "Take over" anything. He fixed a problem.

Accounts being lost was not the problem, because that has absolutely nothing to do with Tercess. The problem, as stated by Cy, was that the AC turn ins on the quests had no record of what you did, so if people complained they lost AC's there was no way of knowing for sure.

Honestly now, who cares if Cy changed up the zone a bit. Now its just long farming for the upcoming items instead of using AC's for them. For everything that went rare, you should be happy for it because you got a rare, AC item. Its no different than buying something from quibble except for having to do the extra work for the other requirements.

If anyone should be mad, it should be the people who bought AC's to use on Void or something else before the announcement, and then were unable to get Void before the mix-up.

by Indestructable on Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:56 am

@Erik

Nothing like a quick database check on the character couldn't hurt. And really? (Rare) is barely a good thing when it comes to money on items lost because they were EXACT copies, just not AC + name...Maybe the flames would've been less if they did 50-62 for the "free" ones, but still..

by Jason on Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:07 am

Yeah, maybe.

by **Erik** on Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:47 am

Indestructable wrote:@Erik

Nothing like a quick database check on the character couldn't hurt. And really? (Rare) is barely a good thing when it comes to money on items lost because they were EXACT copies, just not AC + name...Maybe the flames would've been less if they did 50-62 for the "free" ones, but still..

The items are more than just tagged with "Rare" and bankable, they are completely gone now Indes. If you read the DNs, you should have seen that they are COMPLETELY removed, not just tagged and left with a non-AC version. Plus, they can't do a database check because it doesn't record IF YOU TURNED IN THE QUEST. Check your facts.

by Jason on Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:15 am

He's right, Indes. Those items are gone for good and milt is making brand new ones for totems.

by Indestructable on Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:31 am

@Erik

Kay, I know they are gone and realize now they can't be tracked, but does that give the right to ruin everyone's fun for epic items while de-valuing the originals? Tags just make everything dirty (In my opinion and a few others...)

by Jason on Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:41 am

Tags also bring out "Is that 08, or 09?" "09" "HA NOOB!" The same with 09 and 10.

I'm glad they didn't tag allof the milt items,

by Indestructable on Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:52 am

@Jason

You do have a valid point. But most of them are not ACs. And if they are, not like they are overly elaborated as Milt's. But eh, what done is done I guess. =/

by Jason on Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:23 am

True, most of them aren't ac's. Like OBoM.. But they are still labled as an AC item for some unknown reason.